Founding Full-Stack Product Engineer (AI-Native)
On-Site | San Francisco | Full-Time
$160K–$220K base + meaningful equity
H-1B transfers supported
The Bar
This is a founding engineer seat at an early-stage AI company building core infrastructure for LLM-powered systems.
If you need tight requirements, stable roadmaps, or a slow ramp, this is not the role.
If you ship fast, think clearly, and believe AI-native development changes how software should be built — keep reading.
What Youll Own
End-to-end product engineering: backend, frontend, infrastructure
AI-driven product features (context engineering, internal GenAI tooling)
Telemetry, observability, and system intelligence
Direct interaction with founders and early customers
Fast iteration under incomplete information
You will regularly switch between products, systems, and customer realities. That's the job.
Non-Negotiables
5+ years building and shipping real products as a full-stack engineer
Strong backend bias (60/40 backend/frontend)
Production experience with TypeScript, Node, Next.js
Startup experience where priorities changed weekly — and you still shipped
You actively use AI tools in your daily workflow (not interested in learning)
Clear, concise communicator — in writing and conversation
Strong Signals
Seed to Series A startup experience
Experience with developer tooling, telemetry, or infra-adjacent systems
Public technical thinking (blog, GitHub, X, talks)
Evidence of learning velocity over pedigree
Red Flags (We Will Screen Out)
Long resumes with vague impact
Pure big-tech backgrounds without recent startup experience
Engineers are optimized for promotion cycles instead of ownership
Low-intensity, low-urgency working styles
Candidates who talk about AI but don't use it
Environment
In-person, 5 days/week in San Francisco
High-trust, high-expectation culture
Not a 9–5 shop — consistency and output matter
Small senior team, direct founder access
Interview Process
Founder screen (~15 minutes)
Final on-site loop (up to 4 hours)
Outcome
Best case: you help define a category and build systems that scale with AI.
Worst case: you leave with elite experience, a powerful network, and accelerated growth.
Reject Fast Checklist
Founding Full-Stack Product Engineer (AI-Native)
Internal Recruiter Use Only
1. Resume & Signal Quality (Immediate Filter)
Reject immediately if:
Resume is over 2 pages with vague bullet points
Impact is described as responsibilities instead of outcomes
Heavy buzzwords, light specifics (“led initiatives”, “collaborated cross-functionally”)
No clear evidence of shipping real products
Resume reads like big-company internal tooling work
Green flags:
1–2 pages max
Clear ownership + shipped outcomes
Specific systems, decisions, and tradeoffs
Concise, opinionated writing
2. Startup Reality Check
Reject if:
Only experience is large public companies (FAANG / BigCo) without recent startup work
Candidate expects stable roadmaps, long planning cycles, or heavy process
Optimized for promotions, titles, or scope boundaries
Be cautious if:
Startup experience is Series C+ only
They were insulated from chaos or customer contact
Strong fit:
Seed to Series A experience
Has operated with changing priorities week-to-week
Comfortable with ambiguity and incomplete specs
3. Full-Stack Depth (Backend Bias Required)
Reject if:
Primarily frontend-only or design-heavy
Backend experience is shallow or abstract
Cannot clearly explain system design decisions
Deprioritize if:
Full-stack in title only, backend work minimal
Strong fit:
~60/40 backend to frontend
Comfortable owning APIs, data models, infra-adjacent logic
Has made architectural tradeoffs under pressure
4. AI-Native Reality (Hard Gate)
Reject if:
“Interested in AI” but not actively using it
AI experience limited to a hackathon or side demo
Cannot explain how AI improves their daily workflow
Deprioritize if:
Uses AI occasionally but not as a force multiplier
Strong fit:
Uses AI tools daily (coding, thinking, debugging, writing)
Has built or shipped AI-powered features
Clear belief that AI-native dev changes how software is built
Ask directly:
“How does AI change how you build software day-to-day?”
5. Communication & Thinking Clarity
Reject if:
Rambling, vague, or buzzword-heavy explanations
Struggles to articulate tradeoffs or reasoning
Overly polished corporate speak
Be cautious if:
Technically strong but unclear communicator
Strong fit:
Clear, concise explanations
Comfortable discussing mistakes and learnings
Can simplify complex systems without dumbing them down
6. Intensity & Consistency Check
Reject if:
Explicitly seeking strict 9–5 or low-intensity environments
History of inconsistent availability or follow-through
Missed interviews, slow responses, or flaky behavior
Deprioritize if:
Energy level feels mismatched for an early-stage team
Strong fit:
Consistent, reliable, high-agency operator
Shows ownership mindset
Comfortable with sustained intensity
7. Cultural Anti-Patterns
Reject if:
Entitled tone or prestige-chasing
Fixated on compensation before impact
Blames past teams or managers excessively
Overly rigid preferences on tools, process, or structure
Strong fit:
Bias toward action
Seeks learning over comfort
Willingly pressure-tests assumptions against reality
8. Submission Standard (Non-Negotiable)
Do not submit if you cannot clearly answer:
What did they personally own?
What did they ship?
Why them now for an early-stage AI company?
Every submission must include:
3–5 bullet recruiter summary
Clear backend + AI signal
Why this candidate survives chaos
Final Rule (Very Important)
If you would not personally take this person as a founding engineer on your own startup — do not submit them.
Quality > quantity.
Two strong submissions beat ten mediocre ones.
Client Name: Foam.ai
What to ask candidates•
1. Why are you so bullish on GenAI?
2. How do you stay on top of new developments?
3. Can the candidate be on-site? If not, is the candidate willing to relocate?
4. What is their salary expectation?
5. How actively are they recruiting?
By continuing you agree to our Terms & Privacy Policy.